Home » Reviews » Earphones » ACS T15 Review

ACS T15 Review

Reviewed Dec 2011

Details: First universal IEM from UK-based customs manufacturer ACS
MSRP: £149 / $229 / manufacturer’s page
Current Price:  $229 from; $280 from
Specs: Driver: BA | Imp: 41.5Ω | Sens: N/A | Freq: 16-20k Hz | Cable: 5.5′ L-plug
Nozzle Size: 5.5mm | Preferred tips: trimmed MEElec triple-flanges; stock triple-flanges
Wear Style: Straight down or over-the-ear

Accessories (3.5/5) – Single-flange (3 sizes) and triple-flange (2 sizes) silicone tips; hard clamshell carrying case
Build Quality (4.5/5) – The minimalistic design combines tiny, nondescript-looking plastic housings with a Kevlar-reinforced cable. The color-coded nozzles are surprisingly wide for an armature-based set and the cable lacks strain relief on housing entry. It also has plenty of long-term memory character despite being relatively tangle-resistant
Isolation (4/5) – Tiny, sealed housings allow for very high passive isolation, especially with the triple-flange eartips
Microphonics (4/5) – Present when worn cable-down; low when worn over-the-ear
Comfort (5/5) – The T15 is one of the smallest IEMs on the market and is remarkably unobtrusive. The only odd design choice is the wide nozzle, which makes the fit slightly less universal than – say – an old Etymotic ER6i. For all but those with the smallest ear canals, however, the T15 will be a fit-and-forget earphone with the right tips

Sound (9/10) – Designed in cooperation with Netherlands-based Dynamic Ear Company, who are also involved with ACS’s latest music filters, the tiny single-armature T15 monitors produce a very clear and detailed sound over a wide frequency range. They are by no means bass-heavy but the low end has surprisingly good depth and is fuller than that of Etymotic’s flagship ER-4S, though not by a wide margin. The ER-4S, with its shorter attack and decay times, sounds drier and more clinical than the T15 does. The bass of the T15 is still very clean and articulate, however, as expected from a single-armature reference earphone. It is flat in response and possesses enough detail and texture to keep up with the likes of the Audio-Technica CK10 and HiFiMan RE272, as well as to easily beat the cheaper Fischer Audio SBA-03 save for the slightly lower overall bass quantity.

In the midrange, the T15 is neutral and very accurate. Overall balance is excellent and the midrange aggression of cheaper monitors such as the SBA-03 is nowhere to be found. The T15 is undoubtedly a BA-based earphone, crisp and highly detailed – traits that are very obvious in comparison to the softer, more relaxed HiFiMan RE272. However, it is also refined and smooth, not unlike the Audio-Technica CK10. Transparency yields to the CK10 and Ety ER-4S slightly but again the T15 has a marginally fuller, more fleshed-out sound. Still, its sound will not be confused with that of a dynamic-driver earphone any time soon. Compared to the JVC HA-FXT90, for example, the T15 offers far less bass, less natural timbre, and a dryer, less musical sound but makes sizable gains in clarity and resolution.

The highly neutral tone of the T15 does help with overall realism – both the ATH-CK10 and Etymotic ER-4S sound a touch colder and brighter on the whole. The CK10 especially offers more treble sparkle at the expense of the flatter, less fatiguing treble response of the T15. Top-end extension is similar between the three despite the CK10 being a dual-armature earphone. Where the Audio-Technicas do pull away is imaging – while the ER-4S and RE272 both offer a slightly wider soundstage with similarly good layering to the T15, the CK10 is significantly more three-dimensional, with a larger soundstage and headstage and more precise positioning. Compared to the rest of my armature-based earphones, the T15 easily holds its own – the stage is wider and more realistic than that of the SBA-03 and more spherical than that of the ER-4S. It is still very much a monitor, however – maybe not as revealing and unforgiving as an Ety, but not far behind. Simply put, the T15 is for fans of balanced, analytical sound who want a slightly more even-footed response curve to the traditional high-end Etymotic earphone.

Value (8.5/10) – The ACS T15 is an extremely capable universal monitor in a remarkably tiny package. The plain plastic earphones may not look or feel particularly high-end but the comfort, isolation, and sound quality make the T15 one of the best choices in its price bracket both for professional use and for consumers who value clarity, accuracy, and balance over emphasized bass and flashy cosmetics. Ety lovers especially should take note of the T15.

Pros: tiny size, sturdy construction, high isolation, very detailed and well-balanced
Cons: long, memory-prone cable





Living in the fast-paced city of Los Angeles, ljokerl has been using portable audio gear to deal with lengthy commutes for the better part of a decade. He spends much of his time listening to music and occasionally writes portable audio reviews across several enthusiast sites, focusing mostly on in-ear earphones.


8 Responses

  1. Thank you sir.

    Have had my eye on the CA Orion for a bit, and I’m gonna bear your insight/explanation in mind as I try to suss out a “preference” when compare/contrasting it with the SM3. Think it’ll go some way towards helping me decide which one to return (can’t quite bring myself to hang on to both of them).

    Am glad that I can sort of align my price-point with some variety, and I really appreciate your intel.

  2. In theory you don’t lose anything – there’s some single-driver (even BA) IEMs that are easily top-tiers, and quite a few multi-driver sets that aren’t very good. It’s easier to talk about specific examples, e.g. what something like an ES3 has over the T15. You can generalize and say that the T15’s single armature struggles to cover as much of the frequency spectrum as the ES3’s 3-way system, hence the lack of bass punch and duller treble. But it would still be a generalization as good tuning can compensate for a lot. The ER4, for example, does not struggle with complex pieces while some multi-driver sets can definitely get muddy/congested.

  3. Thanks a bunch ljokerl, I wasn’t even aware of the ES3s. They look like a nice improvement on the SM64’s build (and it’s freq dip). Gonna try to give them a whirl.

    Out of curiosity (hoping this isn’t way too broad a question btw)… mind if I ask you what you think I stand to “lose” by opting for a mid-level single BA (say the T15 or the CA Orion) IEM instead of a 2+ (like the ES3)? Have read that certain singles end up being best-suited for less “complex” (say, acoustic w/ vocals) pieces or simpler arrangements, and am worried I’d end up consigning myself to too much muddiness and a confounded driver w/ a $300ish single-BA IEM?

    I guess I bring this up because I’m still kind of stumped as I try to suss out the various pros/cons of the single vs the multiple.

    Would greatly appreciate some guidance…

    Am I at least quasi-correct in assuming I’d be sacrificing certain upper frequencies, some low end oomph (which may/may not be remedied via an amp), and the ability/capacity to handle more intricate or busy pieces by “settling” for the relative coherency (and occasional affordability) provided by a (mid-tier) single BA?

  4. These types of ergonomic-fit IEMs are all pretty close to one another in isolation, best ones being those that fit deeper in the ear (Westones, Shures, older Earsonics, AudioFly, etc). Best value out of those types of IEMs for me are the Audio-Technica ATH-IM02s, which are comparable to the SD-2 and Westone W20 but typically cost about $100 less. Their isolation is going to be a little lower than the Rockets and sound is about on-par (though I personally prefer the Rockets over these typical dual-driver sets).

    You bring up EarSonics a couple of times, and it actually seems like a pretty good middle ground here if you’re spending more than $250. Their higher-end Velvet can trade blows with the FitEar at a $500 discount and the SM64 is a great middle-ground option, but I think the new ES3 is especially interesting. I find it to be more neutral than the SM64 – it has a very mildly v-shaped sound and fills in the upper midrange nicely where the SM64 has a small dip. SM64 may still be the better option for those who want stronger bass or an earphone that “kills” harshness, but since you’ve also considered the ER4 and have owned Grados, chances are you will like the sound of the ES3 better. It’s one of the better 3-driver sets I’ve heard and a better “next step” from an IM02 or Rockets than Shure or Westone triple.

  5. Thanks for responding ljokerl,

    The Rockets do seem ideal for my purposes actually. Fickle as this sounds, I’d probably pull the trigger right now if I could find some new Rockets with the black cable. In any case, even the standard ones are somewhat elusive and go for about $300+ these days. At that point I’m (perhaps?) well within range of other (superior?) alternatives as well. How would you say they fare (in terms of texture and detail) compared to somewhat loftier options like the SM64 or SD2?

    Accuracy and isolation are (obviously) desirable. But I’ve also become a bit of a stickler for imaging w/ reasonable depth. And having recently put a bit of time into trying out different IEM such as the ER4s, SM64s, UE900s, and a few others, it’s become pretty clear that I may be less (let’s call it) neurotic in the long run if I were to up my budget to accommodate $300+ IEM. Hell, I’m even contemplating something a bit more airy and “au courant” like the Campfire Audio Orion or Nova. Clearly all over the place here…

    Not that I’ve a preference for their relative brightness or anything, but as someone who’s never really outgrown his homebound and modest Grado 60s the hike (sometimes x2+) beyond the $350-$450 mark seems sort of untenable ww my complete ignorance/inexperience re mid-to-high end audio gear in general, and IEM in particular. Something like the FitEar To Go! looks like it’d be an absolute joy, but the larger $1k looms, the more I’m cognizant of the fact that I’ve no substantive way of gauging the performance of something that’s closing in on a pc or cell (price-wise).

    Thanks again for the wise words, and for humoring my humming and hawing.

  6. A happy medium, yes, but not an ER4 (or even HF5) substitute. GR07 isolates less in my experience, but that might because I use triple-flanges on the T15s and I could never get comfortable with triples or foam tips on the GR07. If I was after isolation I’d still go Etymotic (ER4 or HF5), or maybe Aurisonics Rockets if I could get my hands on one. That one is quite good, I use it on all flights nowadays.

    Not sure about the updated ACS cable – sorry.

  7. Hi ljokerl,

    Would appreciate it if you could comment on how the T15s stack up against the ER4s in terms of isolation? I read somewhere that they were merely adequate. The figures even seemed to indicate that they were comparable to the isolation provided by the GR07s.

    Admittedly the latter is (I assume) a different breed of IEM. But if the T15s were to end up falling somewhere between the 3 that I’ve mentioned, would I have found a happy medium of sorts?

    That being said, I’m still enticed by the driver-friendliness of the VSonics, and can’t shake the feeling that I might be better off broadening my listening/sound options (particularly with the apparently/allegedly reduced sibilance of the new GR07 BEs).

    P.S. I suppose I could write to ACS about this bit… but I was also wondering if you happened to know (as of 2k17…) whether the redesigned version of the T15s has seen any improvements to the memory-prone cable?


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Recent posts




ivermectin for sale buy ivermectin