Advanced Sound Model 3 Review – High Performance, Low Fuss

Sound –

As the Model 3 was intended to be used Wireless, all of the following comments will be using the Bluetooth cable paired to my HTC U11 via Apt-x. Through such a connection, the Model 3 sounded dynamic and spacious with very minimal background hiss; when swapping the cable over to a more sensitive in-ear, some hiss was present but this easily remains one if the best wireless implementations I’ve tested. In addition, since I was unable to find a comfortable fit with the included silicone ear tips, I paired the Model 3 with Westone STAR tips. They produced a deeper fit and have a slightly expanded bore producing a cleaner low-end and slightly enhanced treble clarity. I also put the earphones through 150hrs of burn-in to ensure they are performing at their best during evaluation.


Tonality –

The Model 3 assumes a more V-shaped sound typical to consumer earphones. Its sound holds notable mid-bass emphasis with a recessed midrange and slightly more energetic treble presentation. It’s a warm, full and very accessible sound that provides plenty of instant gratification. Of course, this isn’t a perfectly balanced earphone designed for critical listening, but its sound is rich and enjoyable; certainly more tastefully sculpted than models found in retail stores. This is also a presentation that works well in louder environments such as public transport and the gym, where low-frequencies tend to get drowned out. As such, the Model 3’s tuning is well-considered for its intended uses while remaining engaging and balanced enough to be enjoyed at home.


Bass –

With a hearty emphasis, the Model 3’s low-end is very full, delivering round but nicely textured notes. Sub-bass extension is very nice for a micro-driver; they don’t have the guttural slam of a high-end dynamic but do provide solid punch when called for. Mid-bass holds the main focus of the sound, creating a warm tone and a generally full-bodied presentation that stops shy of thick. Resultantly, the Model 3 isn’t especially articulate nor is bass meticulously separated, but the earphones do produce modest amounts of definition and pleasing dynamics.

This is mainly due to the Model 3’s tighter low-end with nice attack and natural decay creating fair pace and rhythm. Accordingly, though their mid-bass emphasis does create apparent bloat, the Model 3 doesn’t become particularly messy during faster tracks and each note remains focussed and easily discerned. So despite their uneven emphasis, the Model 3 remains a well-performing earphone for the price, especially considering that they are being driven by a wireless source.


Mids –

As a result of the Model 3’s larger mid-bass emphasis, mids are bolstered with warmth. That said, slight brightness enhances clarity and definition. And, though not transparent or realistic, the Model 3 delivers a clear and mostly natural midrange presentation despite its fullness. Lower-mids are most notably coloured; male vocals are recessed and somewhat chesty down low but with a slight lift into the middle and upper-midrange that prevents veil. Instrument timbre is also less obviously affected with rich, organic piano and guitar. This tuning does sap their presentation of separation and definition but the Model 3 is tonally pleasing and nowhere near thick or congested.


Upper-mids fair better on an objective level. They are laid-back but present, with slight emphasis relative to the M3’s lower mids preceding a gradual dip before their lower-treble. This produces a smooth, clean and natural presentation that flatters female vocals, avoiding both sibilance and truncation. The Model 3 also produces above average levels of resolution that enable it to discern some finer background details that other wireless in-ears skim over. As a result of the slight dip up top, their upper-midrange and treble aren’t perfectly seamless or integrated, but this doesn’t compromise detail presentation.


Highs –

With a typical V-shaped signature, the Model 3 well balances its warm low-end and more laid-back midrange with elevated treble clarity. This augments their sound with energy and a sense of vividness. Lower-treble is most notably accentuated, producing a slightly more aggressive presentation that benefits treble attack; imbuing guitars, strings and cymbals with a sense of immediacy and crispness. Middle treble is also slightly lifted which aids treble air and separation. They still aren’t a bright earphone in the grand scheme of things, but the Model 3 easily avoids the smoothed off and even dull sound that activity centric wireless in-ears often suffer from.

Still, the Model 3 doesn’t have a hint of harshness and sibilance isn’t emphasized. They also possess great treble extension for a wireless in-ear, producing higher levels of resolution that contributes to their slightly more revealing nature up top. Treble is also quite linear, producing bodied notes with defined texture. Moreover, they effectively avoid sounding overly aggressive and peaky which is very admirable around this price range. Though not absolutely extended and resolving, the Model 3’s crisp but natural high-end is very tasteful and surprisingly technical.


Soundstage, Imaging and Separation –

With a slightly more vivid signature and good treble air and extension, the Model 3 produces a well-sized soundstage. They don’t stretch beyond the head but the Model 3 is hardly an intimate earphone, especially considering its more recessed midrange that can emphasize their sense of space and distance. Imaging is quite good due to their quicker transience and more linear treble. They aren’t pinpoint accurate as they are quite warm and sculpted overall, but directional cues are fairly sharp and vocals well-centred. Separation is mixed, low-end separation is below average due to their bloated mid-bass and some spill into the lower-midrange. However, their top half is quite delineated as it is more linear.

Next Page: Comparisons & Verdict



Picture of Ryan Soo

Ryan Soo

Avid writer, passionate photographer and sleep-deprived medical student, Ryan has an ongoing desire to bring quality products to the regular reader.


8 Responses

  1. I’ve also had the same complaint about them. My first two pairs went mono, the first one with the driver side, the next pair, with the BT cable. I now use that second pair wired 100% of the time, with an upgraded pure silver wire and it sounds even better. I am now waiting on my 3rd pair that I intend to use with the BT cable 100% of the time. The MMCX connectors just can’t take much of a beating. Obviously, I like the tuning of these very much, so I keep buying them. Just wish they didn’t keep dying on me.

  2. Hi Stas,

    We sincerely regret hearing the poor experience you’ve had with your units.
    Please contact our support team via [email protected] and we will make sure address the issues.

    Thank you,
    Customer Services

  3. Hi Manny,

    I’ve only heard the GR07, not the bass edition but have heard they’re fairly similar quality wise. The Model 3 is not as balanced or detailed as the V-Sonic, but it may be a better choice for workouts and use in louder environments. The Model 3 doesn’t emphasize sibilance and the build feels solid to me. I’m not a fan of the wired cable, but the wireless cable works nicely and decent MMCX cables are cheaply found online. For home listening and a more balanced sound, go for the GR07 BE, for travel and commute, the Model 3. I can’t comment on the VSD3S as I haven’t heard that model, apologies.

  4. How does it compare to the vsonic GR07 bass edition and the 1More triple driver? I have a vsonic VSD3S right now but the right headphone stopped working and I’m looking for a replacement/upgrade. I was pretty happy with the VSD3S in terms of SQ. The only problems it has is a bit of sibilance in the highs and the poor build quality.

  5. Hi Tom,

    Thanks for your kind words! The Model 3 is not an especially efficient in-ear so I actually found the cable to provide more volume to the majority of other in-ears. This is mainly why there is no hiss on the Model 3 as it isn’t sensitive enough to pick up background noise.

    I actually paired the cable to my Fidue A85 during review, which is a triple driver hybrid, and it sounded pretty nice compared to my other BT cables. That said, as it is a more sensitive IEM, there was noticeable but not irksome background hiss. Still, it’s one of the better implementations out there imo.


  6. Sorry! I just realised you already mentioned it’s ability to match with other in-ears. I was therefore also wondering also if they had to be ones that are equally power efficient, and/or low impedance?

    It seems to me they may lack the oomph to power hybrids etc, but dual BAs might be OK?

  7. Thanks for another great review.

    This may be a stupid question (apologies if so), but how much mileage is there in attaching these bluetooth cables to a different set of mmcx in-ears, such as the Brainwavz B200 and B400?

    If so, they could sell the cable as a separate unit (without the drivers)?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent posts