Audio Earz AUD-8X by Dream Earz custom in-ear monitors

Audio Earz AUD-8X by Dream Earz custom in-ear monitors review

Portable Sources, DAPs

Sandisk Sansa Clip+: The 8X sounds good with the Clip+ and doesn’t exhibit any weaknesses.  The balance is good across the spectrum and the presentation space is decent.  Bass isn’t as powerful as with higher-end sources, but isn’t lacking. 5/10
Apple iPhone 5: While not much different than the Clip+, the iPhone 5 presents with a slightly more laid-back presentation that has a bit higher instrument separation, leading to slightly better clarity.  Bass is also slightly more powerful.  Overall, the differences between the two are very minimal. 5/10
Hisoundaudio RoCoo BA: Compared with the iPhone 5, the bass quantity is significantly less, but not absent.  The overall presentation is more forward with similar presentation size, space, and detail levels.  There is no real advantage of the RoCoo BA over the iPhone 5 when paired with the 8X unless you want less bass.  There is a slight hiss that can be heard at times with the BA that can’t be heard with the iPhone 5, reducing the score by 0.5. 4.5/10
Hisoundaudio Nova (HSA set to User): The Nova is closer to the RoCoo BA than the iPhone 5, as the presentation isn’t really an improvement, and the bass quantity is lower than that of the iPhone 5.  Clarity, space, detail, and other traits are similar, but the Nova is slightly more forward.  There is no noticeable hiss.  5/10
Fiio X3: The X3 is closest to the Clip+ presentation, but is a bit brighter while still retaining bass quantity and punch.  Spatially, it is slightly larger than the iPhone, RoCoo, Nova, and Clip+, and while closer, it doesn’t have the spatial presentation of the DX50.  There is no hiss with the 8X. 6/10
iBasso DX50: The DX50 shares the presentation style of the DX100, which is a bit more laid-back than the Nova, X3, AK120, or 901.  The DX100 has more bass and presents with more power and better layering, but the DX50 presentation is a bit cleaner and clearer, falling closer to that of the AK120 in quality. Compared with the X3, the DX50 has a bit larger presentation space and slightly more powerful bass.  There is a slight bit of hiss with the 8X.  7.5/10
AK120: This pairing adds a bit of detail, depth of presentation, space, and bass weight to the iPhone 5 presentation, but the biggest improvements come in clarity and cleanliness of the presentation.  The iPhone 5 sounds a bit messy in comparison to the more refined AK120. 8.5/10
HiFi Man 901: The differences between the AK120 and 901 are minimal, with the 901 presenting with a bit more soundstage space, otherwise sounding very similar. 8.5/10
iBasso DX100: The DX100 differs from the AK120 and 901 in that it is more laid-back and has more depth to the presentation, giving a more 3D sound with better instrument separation and layering.  It also is warmer with more bass, but the bass region of the 8X isn’t as controlled as with other source.  The midrange is thicker and the treble is more analytical, which lowers clarity in the mids and adds harshness to the more detailed treble.  If you have spacious tracks that don’t have much bass, the DX100 could be a good choice, otherwise the AK120 and 901 are overall better. 7/10

Portable Sources, DAPs with Amps

iBasso DX50 ->
Shonyun SH-306A: The 306A is cleaner and clearer than the DX50 headphone out (HPO) with better instrument separation.  Presentation size is about the same, but the 306A is slightly more laid back overall.  Bass is more prominent from the DX50 HPO.  While hiss isn’t too dominant from the 306A, it is present.  7.5/10
JDS Labs O2: The O2 presents with a more refined, smoother sound than the DX50 headphone out, with a slightly more laid back sound.  Clarity is similar and the presentation size is nearly identical, with the DX50 having a slight bit more presentation depth. Bass is slightly better controlled with the O2 and there is no noticeable hiss. 7.5/10
Sunrise Dolphin: The Dolphin is similar to the O2 in that the presentation is more refined than the DX50 headphone out, but the Dolphin has a bit more presentation depth and further refines the sound, and the treble is overall softer.  Bass is slightly less prominent than the O2 or DX50 HPO.  There is a slight amount of hiss. 8/10
Headstage Arrow 12HE 4G: The Arrow 4G adds width to the presentation and pushes the midrange back a bit.  Compared with the Sunrise Dolphin, the presentation isn’t quite as 3D and the overall presentation isn’t as refined.  Deep bass is a bit less than the DX50 headphone out.  There is no hiss. 7.5/10
Headamp Pico Slim: The Pico Slim takes the strengths of the Sunrise Dolphin amp and slightly improves, with a cleaner and clearer presentation than the DX50 headphone out while giving up some bass emphasis.  Treble is more refined and smoother without losing detail, and the presentation is slightly more laid back. There is a slight amount of hiss. 8/10
Ortofon MHd-Q7: The MHd-Q7 has good clarity and a brighter sound that gives an air and clarity to the presentation other sources don’t.  Spatial reproduction is average and the presentation is a bit more forward than the DX50 headphone out.  The MHd-Q7 overcomes the issue of the thick presentation better than the other amps I tested.  Unfortunately there is a good deal of hiss, although not enough to take away from the clarity when music is playing. 8.5/10
Leckerton UHA-6S MKII: The UHA-6S performs well with the aud-8X, adding refinement to the sound while keeping the sound cleaner and clearer than the DX50 headphone out.  Bass is about on par with the DX50 HPO.  There is no hiss. 8/10
Tube Amp TA-1: The TA-1 sounds a bit more lively, 3D, and spacious than the Leckerton UHA-6S, Pico Slim, Arrow 4G, and Dolphin.  The presentation is cleaner and clearer than the DX50 headphone out with more deep bass weight that is well controlled.  Overall, the sound is more refined and realistic than the other amps in the price range.  There is a bit of hiss. 9/10
Lear FSM-02 V2 (class A): The FSM-02 V2 presents with a large space that is a good deal larger than the DX50 headphone out and is slightly wider than the Tube Amp TA-1, but doesn’t have the depth.  The bass is more prominent than the DX50 HPO, but less than the TA-1.  Refinement is about on par with the TA-1, which is better than the DX50 HPO.  There is no hiss. 8.5/10
Portaphile 627: The 627 is an improvement over the DX50 headphone output in space, presentation cleanliness, and refinement.  While the improvements are close to that of the Tube Amp TA-1 and Lear FSM-02 V2, the presentation depth isn’t quite as good and the bass isn’t quite as controlled.  The presentation is slightly more forward than the other two amps and there is a very faint hiss. 8/10

Source Summary: The AUD-8X performs relatively well from entry-level sources such as the Clip+ and iPhone 5, and while upgrading to better sources improves the sound, the changes aren’t very significant.  Bass impact and depth do improve with many higher end sources, but if there is too much bass power, control can suffer.  Paired sources don’t significantly alter the midrange when it is too thick, except the Ortofon MHd-Q7 amp.

Audio Earz AUD-8X by Dream Earz custom in-ear monitors

The Audio Earz AUD-8X by Dream Earz is designed to be a full range, high performing, relatively neutral custom in-ear monitor at a reasonable price.  The fun, dynamic, and engaging sound is better for those that want active involvement with their music rather than listen to a flat reference tool or something to use as background music.  Technically, the 8X performs at a very high level with excellent dynamic range, detail levels, imaging, and creation of soundstage space.

While there are many very good aspects of the AUD-8X, notes in the midrange are on the thicker side which can create a slight veil, reducing clarity with audio tracks that have been mastered with their own thickness.  Luckily, this doesn’t happen too often.  Transparency and coherence, while good for the price range, don’t compare with the higher cost CIEMs used for comparison.  With 8 drivers, it can keep up in most ways with more expensive 8-driver CIEMs, but the tonality isn’t on par with the best.  Even with these issues, the Audio Earz AUD-8X is a very capable and enjoyable custom in-ear monitor that will please many people.


–       Impressive effortless dynamics and punch

–       High levels of detail in comparison with similarly priced IEMs/CIEMs


–       Midrange thickness can lead to congestion when a track is warm and thick

View on the custom in-ear monitors list

Previous page: Comparisons with other custom and universal in-ear monitors.





Having a life-long love of high-quality audio and gadgets, average_joe got back in touch with his audiophile side after a hiatus caused by life. His focus became headphones and related gear as the size and price fit his life better than home audio. He believes the entire audio chain is important, and likes to continue to think past the headphone and on into the head, as he believes understanding the details of how we hear will lead to a better audio experience.


4 Responses

  1. Hi Adam,

    There is a significant difference between the 5X and 8X, but $1200 CIEMs can also offer a significant difference, so it comes down to price/improvement. If you are looking for the best overall performance, buy one of the top of the line CIEMs, if you want value, the 8X provides it.



  2. Do you think its worth upgrading from the Aud-5x, which I have, to the Aud-8x for $275? Or should I put that money toward a higher end CIEM in the $1000-1200 price range?

  3. I haven’t heard the Miracle, but based on the PP6, which supposedly shares the Miracle sound signature, the 8X is more mid-forward and doesn’t have quite the spacial characteristics, and is more analytical. Please let me know if you have any other questions.



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent posts