Periodic Audio Ni Portable Amp Review


Sound –

For the Ni, I would like to first assess whether it nails the essentials; a linear frequency response, low-output impedance and black noise floor. In the following sections, we’ll determine how good this amplifier is objectively followed by subjective listening and comparisons/pair-ups to determine price/performance and optimal use cases.

Frequency Response –

Testing Methodology: RMAA via Startech External Sound Card

Periodic Ni

The Ni has a perfectly linear frequency response besides rolling-off progressively below 50Hz by ~1dB. The graph makes this seem worse than it is as, in reality, such a small deviation is not audible, the Ni has quite a full-bodied sub-bass presentation. Due to the quality of my sound card, I am unable to reliably test other measures such as distortion and crosstalk so they will be used as a personal reference only. Qualities here can impact the sound in subjective listening.

Output Impedance & Hiss –

Testing Methodology: SPL volume matched comparison through an inline splitter to JDS Labs Atom + Khadas tone board to Campfire Audio Andromeda

The Campfire Andromeda is extremely source sensitive, quickly losing bass quantity with even a slightly elevated output impedance. With that said, I can safely conclude that the Ni provides a very low output impedance below 1.5 ohms as I was unable to detect a difference in sound signature between the Ni and Atom nor when connecting an iFi IEMatch to better modulate volume. This speaks very well for the Ni’s versatility. Hiss is another story, however. It was more prominent than my other portable sources albeit, those coming from older portable amps will still likely experience a cleaner sound here. It was audible when music was playing at low listening volumes on the Andromeda alongside other sensitive high-end IEMs like the Fibae 7 and Noble Katana.

In fairness, the hiss isn’t too obtrusive, being fairly low-frequency and those that listen at medium to high volumes likely won’t have this issue. The noise doesn’t increase when the device is charging nor have I experienced any EMI or other interference from the source. Still, low volume listeners with sensitive BA earphones that are sensitive to hiss will want to look elsewhere as it is noticeable. The Ni is, therefore, suitable for every driver configuration but ideal only for medium to low-efficiency earphones.

Subjective –

Testing Methodology: SPL volume matched AB with in-line splitter between Pixel 4 + Cozoy Takt-C + Ni and JDS Atom + Khadas tone board to Custom Art Fibae 7 (flat impedance), Final sweep with Tone board + Ni vs Tone board + Atom

The Ni provides a well-extended low-end lacking the last iota of sub-bass drive provided by my desktop setup but providing very convincing weight, nonetheless. To compensate, the Ni possesses a slightly fuller bass note body with a touch of emphasis in the sub-bass granting it a full and powerful foundation. The desktop setup provides a very concise note attack and slightly longer lingering decay while the Ni has less aggressive attack, lacking the same note solidity, paired with quicker decay that provides similarly convincing pace and coherence. Bass is linear through the mid and upper-bass with a neutral tone and control is high resulting in a reasonably clean presentation with good mid-bass definition and separation if not the most defined rumble and physical slam at the very bottom.


The midrange also demonstrates good transparency to the source. There’s a slightly thinner note body which could be a result of a less substantial sub-bass, and less note resolution, in turn. Conversely, a hint of warmth in the midrange grants it pleasing euphony while its note structure permits higher separation and, in a sense, clarity; being well-balanced overall. The presentation remains appropriately dense and smooth through the upper-midrange so these deviations aren’t hugely apparent unless under close scrutiny. For all intents and purposes, the midrange timbre is accurate and natural.

Highs continue this theme, delivering a touch of additional crispness within the foreground at the expense of instrument body. There remains great control with excellent detail retrieval and definition. Decay is slightly truncated and, as such, instruments don’t possess a perfectly accurate timbre and texture. The background is not quite as clean as the Atom with slightly grainier transients if not necessarily any brightness, it simply lacks the same resolution here. Still, it delivers strong background detail retrieval and a strikingly similar sense of distance to the Atom. This is a well-controlled presentation on a whole and an immediate step up from most vanilla portable sources.

The soundstage is also quite pleasing, it is large if not especially three dimensional, with a focus on width especially. Separation is excellent and imaging provides good directionality with sharp directional cues if not perfect coherence with regards to panning and note structure where the desktop setup is perceptibly more agile and involving. Again, expectations must be tempered for a portable source.

Driving Power & Comparisons –

Fiio BTR3 + Hidition NT-8 (110dB, 16.5ohm): Introducing the Ni into this setup, I hear slightly more sub-bass power and extension alongside greater dynamics. The tone is more transparent, the BTR3 being warmer, the Ni grants a cleaner mid-bass tone due to noticeably higher control. Most notable is more concise attack and quicker decay resulting in higher definition overall. Mids are similar in presentation, slightly fuller on the Ni with higher note resolution but with more clarity on the BTR3. The Ni provides cleaner treble transients with greater detail retrieval. The Ni has a slightly larger stage with better separation, similar imaging performance. Minimal hiss on either.

Shanling M0 + Final E5000 (93dB, 14ohm): Volume 24 on high gain, 17 with Ni. The E5000 loves power and saw good results with the Ni. Immediately, there was more sub-bass extension, power and slam, greater dynamic range in general. The tone remained unchanged despite enlarged note size. Higher driver control with greater definition and bass separation was also observed. The midrange presentation was similar with just slightly more note resolution, clean and well-layered overall. The Ni provided sharper high-end transients with higher detail retrieval. Similar soundstage dimensions but with more coherent imaging with stronger centre image and greater separation due to cleaner transients. No hiss on either.

Pixel 4 + Takt-C + Hifiman Sundara (94dB, 37ohm): The Takt-C required 55% volume and 40% with the Ni attached – also be aware that volume control is not linear on Android devices so you will get a lot more volume at higher settings. The most immediate difference was an increase in dynamic range. I didn’t have to turn up the volume to hear treble details and achieve visceral bass slam, the Ni provided deeper extension with more solid slam alongside greater driver control yielding higher mid-bass definition and separation at a comfortable volume. The Ni provided a slightly sharper transient response and a cleaner sound throughout. Highs were also more detailed and extended with a larger soundstage and more apparent layering. No hiss on either.

JDS Atom + Hifiman Sundara (94dB, 37ohm): As compared to my JDS Atom, it was a shockingly similar experience in terms of dynamics and extension. The Atom was a touch cleaner in the highs with a more expansive soundstage. The Atom also provided higher resolution throughout. There was a touch more heft in the sub-bass, however, the difference was not nearly to the same extent as that between the Ni and my portable sources alone than stepping up from the Ni to the Atom. This obviously won’t replace your desktop setup or your high-end dedicated sources, they are clearly more resolving, but it will get close in terms of dynamics and drive at a reasonable price and with a stunningly portable form factor. No hiss on either too.

Suggested Pair Ups

With a 250mW output power into a 32ohm load, the Ni has heaps of power and experiences no difficulty driving basically any IEM or portable headphone and will do well with some full-size headphones too. Even with more efficient gear, an appreciable difference to dynamics and driver control can be heard. There’s also plenty of volume on tap for low-sensitivity and high impedance designs such as those implementing Sonion EST drivers. The Ni pairs brilliantly with smartphones, BT receivers and small DAPs such as the Shanling M0.

Verdict –


The Ni is actually quite a unique product in this day and age. Though I fondly remember daisy-chaining portable amplifiers to my smartphone, products such as those from RSA and Headamp haven’t been updated for some years as the portable stack has fallen out of fashion in favour of all in one solutions. The Ni modernises these archaic designs, providing a much more polished experience overall. It measures well and has a very low output impedance so it won’t skew the signature of low-impedance multi-driver earphones that have also become increasingly complex in recent years. The Ni, therefore, represents the resurgence of the portable stack and a return to the golden age of HiFi where power and dynamics reigned supreme. This does come with one caveat, the noise floor, which is higher than most sources but not unbearable. If you’re looking to transform your portable listening and don’t mind a bit of hiss on sensitive monitors, the Ni is a tremendously convincing package.

The Ni is available from on Periodic Audio and Hifiheadphones (International) for $299 USD at the time of writing. I am not affiliated with Periodic Audio or Hifiheadphones and receive no earnings from purchases through this link.

1 2

About Author

Avid writer, passionate photographer and sleep-deprived medical student, Ryan has an ongoing desire to bring quality products to the regular reader.

Leave A Reply

buy ivermectin for sale buy ivermectin online