YOU ARE AT
Home » Articles » Wireless fidelity: making sense of Bluetooth headphone technology
a
Bluetooth Logo

Wireless fidelity: making sense of Bluetooth headphone technology

 

Bluetooth is a short-range, low-power wireless standard for transmission of digital data that has been around since 1998. It has many uses, but of course the one we are most interested in here at The Headphone List is audio streaming.

Bluetooth has evolved a number of specifications and profiles over the years, which can be somewhat confusing and are rarely explained all in one place. The purpose of this article is to provide a brief introduction to Bluetooth technology pertinent to audio streaming.

Article overview (click to jump to a particular section)

Bluetooth basics
Bluetooth versions (v2.1, v3.0, v4.0)
Bluetooth profiles (HSP, HFP, A2DP, AVRCP)
Bluetooth audio codecs (SBC, aptX, AAC)
Additional features (NFC, Multipoint)
Bluetooth compatibility and limitations
Selecting the right Bluetooth headphone

Bluetooth basics

 

Bluetooth Logo
Bluetooth Logo

Bluetooth devices come in all manners of shape, size, and function, but as far as audio is concerned there are two basic types – transmitters and receivers. A Bluetooth audio transmitter is any audio source with Bluetooth functionality, for example an iPhone, computer, or dongle that receives audio input from another device. A Bluetooth audio receiver can be a wireless headphone or speaker, or a dedicated audio receiver.

The transmitter sends out a digital signal encoded in a way the receiver can recognize. The receiver then decodes this signal and converts it to analog for audio playback. To establish a link between transmitter and receiver and determine which Bluetooth profiles can be used (see Bluetooth profiles section below), an initial setup step called “pairing” is necessary.

Bluetooth versions

 

Bluetooth is commonly listed with a specification version, usually ranging from v2.0 to v4.1. Newer Bluetooth versions are backwards-compatible and any optional components that may follow the Bluetooth version number, such as +EDR (enhanced data rate) and +HS (high speed), do not affect Bluetooth audio streaming.

Bluetooth v2.1 simplified and streamlined the pairing procedure back in 2007, which headphones do take advantage of. Later Bluetooth versions improved power handling and power saving functionality, which may affect attributes such as range and connectivity, but anything specified v2.1 or newer will be equivalent as far as audio quality is concerned.

With Apple products such as iPhones and iPads, compatible headsets with Bluetooth v3.0 and newer will show an on-screen battery meter.

Bluetooth profiles

Creative Aurvana Live! 2 Bluetooth
Creative Aurvana Platinum Bluetooth headphones

Bluetooth profiles are sets of specifications for how certain functionality must be implemented by Bluetooth devices. There are dozens of profiles for everything from file transfer to wireless printing, but the ones we are interested in are those applicable to headphones and headsets.

HSP (Headset Profile) – allows basic headset functionality with microphone input, 64kbps mono audio, and limited remote control

HFP (Handsfree Profile) – a more advanced version of HSP also designed for mono headsets; among other things adds support for additional remote functions such as redialing and voice dialing. The latest version (1.6) adds optional support for better-quality audio via a mono configuration of the SBC codec used by A2DP

A2DP (Advanced Audio Distribution Profile) – designed for multimedia and used for stereo audio transmission over Bluetooth. This is the profile we are interested in as headphone users

AVRCP (Audio/Video Remote Control Profile) – provides remote control of media playback (e.g. play/pause and skip/previous track functions); used in conjunction with A2DP. The latest AVRCP versions (1.4 and 1.5) allow direct control of device volume as well. With previous versions, volume controls affected headset volume independently of the connected device.

All stereo headphones support A2DP and AVRCP, and – if a microphone is present – at least HSP for headset functionality. Most stereo Bluetooth headsets implement all four of the above profiles.

Bluetooth audio codecs

So far so good, but what determines how audio is sent to a wireless headphone? That would be the codec. After the transmitter selects the appropriate profile, it chooses a codec to digitally compress the audio for sending to the headphone. The headphone then decodes the file for playback. Although it is theoretically possible to send mp3s or any other digital format straight to the headphones over Bluetooth, this is not what happens. Instead, the A2DP profile specifies its own set of audio codecs.

 

SBC (Subband Coding) – this is the mandatory default codec for A2DP and is supported by all Bluetooth stereo audio devices. It was designed to provide reasonably good audio quality over the limited bandwidth of Bluetooth without heavy processing power requirements for encoding/decoding. SBC is capable of bitrates up to about 328 kbps at a 44.1kHz sampling rate (source). This is not far off from the maximum for mp3 encoding, though mp3 is superior to SBC in terms of audio quality given similar bitrates (source).

The biggest problem from an audio quality standpoint is that SBC is also capable of mid- and low-quality streams, which sound quite compressed and to my ears are unacceptable for music streaming. Sound quality varies widely between different SBC implementations. A generic USB Bluetooth transmitter I picked up for $3 from eBay sounded absolutely atrocious because it defaulted to the lowest SBC quality, but installing a brand-name one with a CSR chipset in its place had excellent results.

With some versions of Apple OS X, SBC quality is set to low or medium by default but can be changed manually to increase audio quality and fix other issues (source).

 

aptX Logo
aptX Logo

aptX – aptX is a proprietary audio codec developed for demanding audio applications. Its use in Bluetooth devices is entirely optional. In fact, aptX is currently supported by only one manufacturer of Bluetooth chipsets – CSR – who acquired parent company APT back in 2010 (source).

aptX is designed to encode a CD-quality (16-bit / 44.1kHz) audio stream without loss of sound quality through a combination of slightly higher data transfer rate compared to SBC as well as more efficient audio encoding. The caveat is that both the headphone and the source must support aptX – if either one lacks aptX support, the default SBC codec will be used instead. Currently, aptX support is limited to mostly high-end Android smartphones and Hi-Fi wireless devices. My Nexus 5, for example, does not support apt-X (source). It is also not implemented in Apple devices such as iPhones and iPods.

For more information on aptX, visit the CSR website

For a list of aptX-compatible devices, see here

 

AAC (Advanced Audio Coding) – unlike SBC and aptX, AAC is a codec popular outside of wireless applications, including Apple’s iTunes platform and YouTube. It was designed to achieve better sound quality than mp3 at similar bit rates. Unlike aptX, it is supported by iOS devices. Apple implements AAC over Bluetooth at about 250 kbps (source – pdf), which should compete in fidelity with the best-quality mp3s or any other lossy codec. However, at this time AAC support in wireless headphones is not very common.

 

At least in theory, Bluetooth transmitters automatically default to the “best” quality codec available. The default Bluetooth stereo audio codec, SBC, can sound quite good with the right implementation, especially for on-the-go use. However, it can also produce some horribly compressed-sounding audio at its worst. aptX takes out the guesswork, maintaining consistently high bitrates, but both the transmitter and receiver have to support it and it is not implemented in Apple devices. AAC is supported by Apple devices, but not many other transmitters, and has been picked up by few headphones. For those concerned with audio quality, at least for the time being, aptX seems to be the solution to beat.

Additional features

 

There are a few more Bluetooth functions that are supported by some current headphones. These are independent of the profiles and protocols listed above and don’t affect audio quality, but are worth mentioning for the sake of completeness.

 

Sony SBH80
Sony SBH80 earphones showing NFC area

NFC (Near field communication) – NFC is a wireless standard for close-proximity data exchange. While it can technically be considered a Bluetooth competitor, NFC has a very different set of strengths and weaknesses. It has slower transfer speeds than Bluetooth and a much shorter range (a few inches at most), but also uses far less power and does not require “pairing”.

There are many different uses for NFC ranging from mobile payments to data transfer. When it comes to headphones, however, NFC is used as a “handshaking” shortcut to establish connection. Bluetooth devices that support NFC can be paired and connected by simply bringing their NFC chips together. In the case of my Nexus 5, this has allowed me to pair, connect, and disconnect NFC-enabled headsets without ever opening the phone’s Bluetooth menu. Doesn’t seem like a big deal at first, but it is surprisingly convenient in everyday use. The caveat, of course, is that that both devices have to support NFC.

For a list of devices with NFC support, see here.

 

Multipoint – Multipoint (as opposed to Singlepoint) refers to the ability of a Bluetooth accessory – most likely a headset – to maintain two Bluetooth connections simultaneously. For instance, a Multipoint headset can have a tablet and phone connected to it at the same time. If a call comes in on the phone while music is streaming from the tablet, music playback on the tablet will be paused and the user will be able to take the phone call on the headset. When the call is terminated, the headset will switch back to the tablet and resume music playback automatically.

Like NFC, multipoint is not at all vital and has no bearing on audio fidelity, but it’s a pretty nice feature to have that I can see become more widely desired as the popularity of wireless headsets grows.

Bluetooth compatibility and limitations

 

Compatibility There are some limitations on which Bluetooth devices can work with headsets. For instance gaming consoles such as the PlayStation 4 and Xbox One are not compatible with standard Bluetooth headsets – see the Profile Limitation section below for an explanation of why. In addition, some older basic phones may lack A2DP support if they were not designed for music playback and Bluetooth support on the Windows operating system is a bit of a mess (one of the USB dongles I purchased worked perfectly with one Windows 7 x64 machine but the drivers absolutely refused to install on another machine with the same operating system). Other than that, compatibility shouldn’t be much of a concern these days as newer Bluetooth specifications tend to be backwards-compatible. Any stereo Bluetooth headset will work with an iPhone or Android smartphone, for example.

Sony BM10
Sony BM10 Wireless Music Receiver

Receiver vs Transmitter – Keep in mind that Bluetooth chipsets don’t always contain both a Bluetooth transmitter and receiver, so if you’re looking to use your Bluetooth headset with your TV, don’t rely on your Bluetooth-enabled sound bar or home theater receiver. Most of the time these devices can receive audio via Bluetooth but are not designed to send an audio stream to a set of headphones. Likewise, 3.5mm Bluetooth dongles are often one-way devices, having either a receiver or a transmitter, but not both.

Lag/latency – Because of the encoding-decoding steps done by Bluetooth audio devices, there can be some latency between source and headset, ranging from imperceptible to quite bothersome. It’s not a big deal for music, but causes lip-synching issues with video and oftentimes makes Bluetooth headsets unusable for gaming. As with all things Bluetooth, the severity of lag varies widely depending on hardware and software. In my experience it also seems to vary with distance, with video and audio going out of sync as the headset is moved away from the audio source.

One of the versions of the aptX codec mentioned previously is designed to reduce Bluetooth latency and should be suited best for use with a TV (source).

Profile limitation – Bluetooth headsets are currently limited to using one profile at a time. Those who read the Bluetooth Profiles section above carefully will note that this presents a problem as the A2DP profile supports stereo audio, but not microphone functionality, and the HSP and HFP profiles support mics but are limited to low-quality mono transmission. This renders modern Bluetooth headsets unusable for gaming that also requires voice chat, for example, as the audio will come through in low-quality mono rather than stereo. Likewise, while using Skype or any other software that requires continuous headset functionality, any music that is playing simultaneously will stream through headset profile in low-quality mono and sound terrible as a result.

Mobile devices such as iPhones and Android phones and tablets do a great job of switching between profiles automatically. Windows PCs and OSX computers – not so much, and may sometimes need to be switched manually depending on software configuration.

The rest of the headphone – Coming full circle to the realm of wired audio — a Bluetooth headphone will only sound as good as its audio components. A headphone can support all of the latest in Bluetooth technology, but if the drivers deliver muddy bass and distorted mids, that’s what you will hear. Also, while this overview focuses specifically on Bluetooth technology, in the case of wireless headphones the DAC (digital-to-analog converter) and amplifier – components that audiophiles tend to put so much importance on in wired audio – are both built right into headphone. This can give the headphone designer even more control over the sound, but can also be the weakest link with subpar implementation. Wireless headsets that also support a pass-through wired connection make it quite easy to figure out whether or not their sound quality is limited by the Bluetooth components and built-in amplification.

The wrap-up: selecting the right Bluetooth headphone

 

As with conventional wired headphones, there are plethora of Bluetooth devices on the market of all different shapes, sizes, and costs. In addition to the usual considerations when buying a set of headphones, these add complexity by providing Bluetooth specifications for the buyer to mull over. I normally do not recommend looking at headphone specifications as they yield little useful info, but with Bluetooth sound quality in mind there are some things that can be gleaned from the specs.

As it turns out, Bluetooth version is mostly inconsequential from an audio quality point of view – any headphone specified as v2.1 or higher should be fine. Likewise, supported Bluetooth profiles are not something to worry about as all stereo Bluetooth headphones support A2DP. All A2DP devices support the standard SBC audio codec, though implementation quality varies. If your device supports aptX, an aptX headphone will take the guesswork out of audio codecs, providing consistently good audio quality over Bluetooth. AAC will do the same for the few devices that support it.

NFC and multipoint technologies provide additional functionality and may be a deal breaker for some, but don’t have a bearing on audio quality. The audio components of the headphone itself do, however. At this point, a good headphone can sound quite good over Bluetooth, but a bad headphone will always remain just that.

 

Huge thanks to Sead Smailagic of Sony Mobile for taking the time to field my numerous questions and fill in the blanks.

For some Bluetooth wireless headphone recommendations, see our brief Bluetooth headphone roundup. Questions or comments? Leave them below.

Note: All trademarks are the property of their respective owners

Last updated 09/14/2014

 

SHARE.

ABOUT AUTHOR

ljokerl

ljokerl

Living in the fast-paced city of Los Angeles, ljokerl has been using portable audio gear to deal with lengthy commutes for the better part of a decade. He spends much of his time listening to music and occasionally writes portable audio reviews across several enthusiast sites, focusing mostly on in-ear earphones.

RELATED POSTS

70 Responses

  1. I bought a Sandisk Sport Clip Plus because of the Bluetooth function and a pair of wireless earbuds. The Sport Clip Plus has Bluetooth version 2.13 and the wireless earbuds are Bluetooth version 4.1. It appears as though the two items are paired as the Sport Clip Plus identifies the earbuds and the earbuds blink as though they are paired, but there is no audio coming from the earbuds. The earbuds work fine with my iPhone and iPad so I don’t know what the problem is with the Sport Clip Plus (the volume is turned all the way up), especially since it appears to be paired. Any ideas???

  2. Hi,

    I’m wondering if Samsung Galaxy S7 and S8 support AAC over Bluetooth. I plan on buying Jaybird X3 (they support AAC but not AptX) and would like to avoid being stuck with SBC.

  3. That’s what I was wondering about. I was very surprised that Apple didn’t switch to a lossless format for its audio content in recent years, and after the AirPods were introduced and the headphone jack removed, I figured that that might have been the reason. Streaming lossless audio on BT is very power consuming, and is useless if you to transmit it compressed. However, if you transmit the same AAC steam you are playing, your device can save power on decompressing and re-compressing the stream, and your headphones can enjoy real 256kbps audio quality that is not double compressed, which is still not audiophile grade, yet not that bad altogether. I wonder if anyone has the answer.

  4. This is something I haven’t been able to find a straight answer to specifically as it relates to AAC over Bluetooth on Apple devices. For algorithms that are Bluetooth specific, such as aptX, there is obviously an independent compression instance. For a stream that’s already in AAC format being transmitter over AAC, I’m not sure.

  5. This transmitter not help if your headphone does not also support aptX. All benefits of aptX, including the low-latency benefit, require both sides to support it.

    For your other question, not all Bluetooth audio streams have the same quality in the absence of aptX. See this section:

    “The biggest problem from an audio quality standpoint is that SBC is also capable of mid- and low-quality streams, which sound quite compressed and to my ears are unacceptable for music streaming. Sound quality varies widely between different SBC implementations. A generic USB Bluetooth transmitter I picked up for $3 from eBay sounded absolutely atrocious because it defaulted to the lowest SBC quality, but installing a brand-name one with a CSR chipset in its place had excellent results.”

    Chances are that your PC is defaulting to a lower-quality audio stream than your iPhone.

  6. Double compression? If, for instance, I am using an Apple device playing an AAC stream at 256kbps, will the device transmit that same stream, or re-compress it and then stream it to a compatible BT headphone? There is a lot of difference between a 256 compression and a 256×256 compression, which could sound more like 160 kbps.

  7. My BT headphone doesnt support Apt-x but everyone seems to suggest me buying an Apt-x low latency bluetooth transmitter for my TV to avoid lip-lagging. From your article, it sounds like there is only benefit with Apt-x if two devices have apt-x. Does the option like this http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/172613555648?_trksid=p2060353.m1438.l2649&ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT work? Note, my TV only has digital optical audio out. Lagging?

    A separate question. I find sound quality isn’t the best pairing my BT headphone (A2DP supported) with my PC. I am not quite sure that’s the case. With my iphone, no problem.

  8. I have a Dell xps 8700 desktop which has bluetooth 4.0. Would it pair with Bose headphones, which are A2DP? I’d like to hear music on my pc library, which is much vaster than anything on my Ipad.

  9. Sounds like a software issue to be honest – since there’s no connection issues between the laptop and your headset for regular audio streaming it’s not likely to be a hardware/compatibility issue – I can’t think of a reason the program would limit compatibility to BT 3.0 but not BT 2.1 headsets.

    I would hold off on buying new hardware bits and try to troubleshoot the specific error you are seeing. Google and support from the company that makes the software are your friends here. For example there’s some possible troubleshooting advice here: http://nuance-community.custhelp.com/posts/d160617503

  10. I have a bluetooth headset 2.1+edr HSP with mic. It connects well with my laptop. but there is a software Dragon Naturally speaking(voice recognition software to control your pc and speech to text typing use). this software supports Headset with bluetooth version 3.0, adapter v2.1+edr. it recognises my headset but it does supports the headset and gives an error “sound is too low.” is it possible if I use my headset with by pairing it through a suitable adapter the audio quality will improve. And also kindly advise which adapter should I buy.

  11. That is correct. I suspect the manufacturer of the Bluetooth chip finds it easier to put both codecs in their chip than manufacture 4 different chips depending on which combination of aptX/AAC/none a headset manufacturer desires. I just spent a few days emailing back and forth with Sennheiser about the AAC codec and they would only say not (officially) supported until the licensing was settled – Now now it appears in the specs.

  12. Monoprice blurb states apt-X is supported which is/was owned by Qualcoom – a known licensing abuser. I suspect the decode chip manufacturer added the AAC codec as a matter of manufacturing efficiency and Monoprice is just oblivious.

  13. I have a feeling this is often the case – I believe AAC requires a license and I can’t see budget manufacturers like Monoprice wanting to pay that fee to use the AAC trademark.

  14. I have a ~2 year old set of BT earbuds I bought from Monoprice (branded) for $40 that support AAC. The manual doesn’t say so but when I enable ACC/BT on my MacBookPro and connect I can see AAC is being used.

  15. Yes

    “Bluetooth is commonly listed with a specification version, usually ranging from v2.0 to v4.1. Newer Bluetooth versions are backwards-compatible…”

  16. Does Bluetooth portable speaker having v2.1 supports mobile having Bluetooth v4.1 please reply fast as soon as possible………

  17. This is not possible if we’re talking about stereo transmitters – see the section above titled “profile limitation”.

    There are dongles that will transmit OR receive, but not at the same time and you will have to select the mode with a hard switch.

Leave a Reply to Mark Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

Recent posts

Sponsors

Sponsors

Categories

ivermectin for sale buy ivermectin